Lawwly
Subject

Family Law

900 briefs · page 16 of 19

Peters-Riemers v. Riemers644 N.W.2d 197 (2002)Peterson v. Peterson434 N.W.2d 732 (S.D. 1989)Piatt v. Piatt499 S.E.2d 567 (1998)Pickard v. Pickard625 S.E.2d 869 (N.C. App. 2006)Pikula v. Pikula374 N.W.2d 705 (1985)Pohlmann v. Pohlmann703 So. 2d 1121 (1997)Polacheck v. Polacheck5 N.E.3d 1088 (2013)Port v. Cowan44 A.3d 970 (Md. 2012)Porter v. Arkansas Department of Health and Human Services286 S.W.3d 686 (Ark. 2008)Porter v. Porter472 So.2d 630 (1985)Postema v. Postema471 N.W.2d 912 (Mich. Ct. App. 1991)Pratt v. Pratt56 So. 3d 638 (2010)Price v. Price732 S.W.2d 316 (1987)Pusey v. Pusey728 P.2d 117 (Utah 1986)Pyeatte v. Pyeatte135 Ariz. 346 (1982)Quintana v. Ordono195 So. 2d 577 (1967)R.R. v. M.H. & another689 N.E.2d 790 (1998)Raftopol v. Ramey12 A.3d 783 (2011)Rainwater v. Rainwater869 P.2d 176 (1993)Rankin v. Rankin124 A.2d 639 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1956)Rappaport v. Katz380 F. Supp. 808 (S.D.N.Y. 1974)Reece v. Elliott208 S.W.3d 419 (2006)Reese v. Muret150 P.3d 309 (2007)Reid v. Reid375 S.E.2d 533 (1989)Renaud v. Renaud721 A.2d 463 (1998)Reyes v. Reyes891 N.Y.S.2d 222 (2009)Rice v. Rice336 S.W.3d 66 (Ky. 2011)Richardson v. Richardson218 S.W.3d 426 (2007)Richter v. Richter625 N.W.2d 490 (Minn. Ct. App. 2001)Riley v. Riley138 P.3d 84 (2006)Rivero v. Rivero216 P.3d 213 (Nev. 2009)Rivkin v. PostalUnpublished, 2001 WL 1077952 (2001)Roberts v. Roberts586 S.E.2d 290 (2003)Robinson v. Robinson150 P.2d 7 (1944)Rodgers v. Rodgers519 S.W.3d 324 (2017)Roe v. Conn417 F. Supp. 769 (N.D. Ala. 1976)Rose on Behalf of Clancy v. Moody629 N.E.2d 378 (N.Y. 1993)Rosenberg v. Rosenberg497 A.2d 485 (1985)Rosenstiel v. Rosenstiel209 N.E.2d 709 (1965)Rousey v. Rousey528 A.2d 416 (1987)Rowe v. Franklin663 N.E.2d 955 (1995)Rozan v. Rozan49 Cal. 2d 322 (1957)Ruggles v. Ruggles860 P.2d 182 (1993)Ryan v. Ryan677 N.W.2d 899 (2004)Rykiel v. Rykiel838 So. 2d 508 (2003)Sagar v. Sagar781 N.E.2d 54 (2003)Sanjari v. Sanjari755 N.E.2d 1186 (2001)Santosky v. Kramer455 U.S. 745 (1982)