Rozan v. Rozan

Supreme Court of California

49 Cal. 2d 322 (1957)

Relevant factsFree

Mr. and Mrs. Rozan moved to and were domiciled in California starting in 1948, where Mr. Rozan earned money as an oil broker, and after losing an earlier fortune, the couple used his California earnings to purchase real property in North Dakota. The trial court found the North Dakota property was community property and, based on evidence of Mr. Rozan's extreme cruelty, awarded Mrs. Rozan a disproportionate 65 percent share; Mr. Rozan appealed.

IssueFree

Whether, under state law, the characterization of property as community property is based on the location of a married couple's domicile.

Holding & reasoning

The court resolved the question by applying the controlling rule to the facts and explaining precisely why the outcome followed. Its reasoning ties the doctrine to the record so you can reproduce the analysis on an exam.

Procedural history, concurrence & dissent

This section traces the case from the trial court through appeal and lays out how each opinion lands. Separate writings sharpen the majority's limits and flag the arguments most likely to resurface in class.

Unlock the full brief

Free accounts read 20 full briefs. No card required.

Start free Log in