Lawwly
Subject

International Law

150 briefs · page 2 of 4

Questions Relating to the Obligation to Prosecute or Extradite (Belgium v. Senegal)2012 I.C.J. 422R (Begum) v. Headteacher and Governors of Denbigh High School(2006) UKHL 15Rainbow Warrior (New Zealand v. France)82 I.L.R. 500, 551-64 (1990)Rasul v. Bush542 U.S. 466 (2004)Re Wood Pulp Cartel[1988] E.C.R. 5193Reference Re Secession of Quebec37 I.L.M. 1340 (1998)Regina v. Bartle, Bow Street Stipendiary Magistrate & Commissioner of Police, Ex Parte Pinochet2 W.L.R. 827, 38 I.L.M. 581 (1999)Regina v. Keyn2 Law Reports (Exchequer Division) 63 (1876)Reparation for Injuries Suffered in the Service of the United Nations1949 I.C.J. 174Republic of Argentina v. Weltover, Inc.504 U.S. 607 (1992)Republic of Croatia v. Girocredit Bank A.G. der Sparkassen36 International Legal Materials 1520 (1997)Republic of Ireland v. United Kingdom2 Eur. Ct. H.R. (ser. A) at 25 (1978)Request for Interpretation of the Judgment of 15 June 1962 in the Case Concerning The Temple of Preah Vihear (Cambodia v. Thailand)Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 2013, p. 281 (Nov. 11, 2013)Reservations to the Convention on Genocide1951 I.C.J. 15Responsibilities and Obligations of States with Respect to Activities in the Area2011 I.T.L.D.S Reports 10Respublica v. de Longchamps1 U.S. (1 Dall.) 111 (1784)Rewe-Zentral Aktiengesellschaft v. Bundesmonopolverwaltung fur Branntwein (Cassis de Dijon Case)1979 E.C.R. 649RJR Nabisco, Inc., v. European Community136 S. Ct. 2090 (2016)Rubin v. Islamic Republic of Iran138 S. Ct. 816 (2018)Ruling Pertaining to the Differences between France and New Zealand Arising from the Rainbow Warrior Affair19 U.N. Rep Intl. Arb. Awards 199 (1986)S.A.S v. France2014 Eur. Ct. H.R. 695 (2014)Şahin v. Turkey44 Eur. H.R. Rep. 99 (2005)Sale v. Haitian Centers Council509 U.S. 155 (1993)Salimoff & Co. v. Standard Oil186 N.E. 679 (1933)Samantar v. Yousuf560 U.S. 305 (2010)Saperstein v. The Palestinian Authority2006 WL 3804718 (2006)Sarei v. Rio Tinto, PLC456 F.3d 1069 (2006)Saudi Arabia v. Nelson507 U.S. 349 (1993)Schnall v. AT&T Wireless Services, Inc.225 P.3d 929 (2010)Schoenbaum v. Firstbrook405 F.2d 200 (2d Cir. 1968)Sei Fujii v. California242 P.2d 617 (1952)Serbia & Montenegro v. United Kingdom (Legality of Use of Force)I.C.J. 2004 I.C.J 1307Siderman De Blake v. Republic of Argentina965 F.2d 699 (9th Cir. 1992)Somerset v. Stewart98 Eng. Rep. 499 (1771)Sosa v. Alvarez-Machain542 U.S. 692 (2004)Spain v. France (Lac Lanoux Arbitration)24 I.L.R. 101 (1956)Spector v. Norwegian Cruise Line Ltd.545 U.S. 119 (2005)Sterling Drug, Inc. v. Bayer AG14 F.3d 733 (1994)Tagaga v. INS228 F.3d 1030 (2000)Techt v. Hughes128 N.E. 185 (1920)Tecnicas Medioambientales Tecmed S.A. ("Tecmed") v. MexicoICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/00/2, Award, 43 I.L.M. 133 (2004)Texaco Overseas Petroleum Co. v. Libya104 J. Droit Int'l 350 (1977)Texas Trading & Milling Corp. v. Federal Republic of Nigeria647 F.2d 300 (1981)The "Hoshinmaru" Case (Japan v. Russian Federation)ITLOS Case No. 14 (2007)The Aaland Islands Question: Report Submitted to the Council of the League of Nations by the Commission of RapporteursLeague of Nations Doc. B7/21/68/106 (1921)The AM & S Case1982 E.C.R. 1575 (1982)The Asylum Case1950 I.C.J. 266 (1950)The M/V "Saiga" (No. 2) (St. Vincent v. Guinea)38 International Legal Materials 1323 (1999)