Lawwly

Florida v. Powell

United States Supreme Court

559 U.S. 50 (2010)

Relevant factsFree

Before questioning Powell (defendant) about a robbery, officers told him he had the right to talk to a lawyer before answering any questions and could invoke that right at any time during the interview; Powell said he understood and answered questions, ultimately making incriminating statements about a handgun. Powell argued the warning misleadingly suggested he could consult a lawyer only before, not during, questioning; the trial court denied his motion to suppress, the Florida Supreme Court reversed, and the U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari.

IssueFree

Whether Miranda requires an explicit, exact formulation of words to be communicated to a suspect before custodial interrogation.

Unlock the full brief

Free accounts read 20 full briefs. No card required.

Related cases