Florida v. Powell
United States Supreme Court
559 U.S. 50 (2010)
Relevant factsFree
Before questioning Powell (defendant) about a robbery, officers told him he had the right to talk to a lawyer before answering any questions and could invoke that right at any time during the interview; Powell said he understood and answered questions, ultimately making incriminating statements about a handgun. Powell argued the warning misleadingly suggested he could consult a lawyer only before, not during, questioning; the trial court denied his motion to suppress, the Florida Supreme Court reversed, and the U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari.
IssueFree
Whether Miranda requires an explicit, exact formulation of words to be communicated to a suspect before custodial interrogation.