Lawwly

Duckworth v. Eagan

United States Supreme Court

492 U.S. 195 (1989)

Relevant factsFree

After police connected Eagan (defendant) to an attack, he was read a waiver form advising him of his right to remain silent and to consult an attorney, but adding that police had "no way of giving you a lawyer, but one will be appointed for you...if and when you go to court." Eagan signed the waiver, repeated his story, and was later re-interrogated with a different Miranda waiver and confessed. His confession was admitted at trial over objection, and he was convicted; on federal habeas review, the district court found the waiver defective for not clearly conveying his right to consult an attorney before questioning, and the Supreme Court granted certiorari.

IssueFree

Whether Miranda warnings must conform to the exact language set forth in Miranda v. Arizona.

Unlock the full brief

Free accounts read 20 full briefs. No card required.

Related cases