Lawwly

In re Griffith

Court of Appeals of Ohio

585 N.E.2d 937 (1991)

Evidence
Relevant factsFree

The Ohio Veterinary Medical Board (plaintiff) charged veterinarian Don Griffith (defendant) with unprofessional conduct after he performed a surgical procedure on a kitten; at the Board's hearing, Griffith presented expert testimony, but the Board nonetheless found the procedure fell below minimum standards of care and issued a written reprimand, which the Court of Common Pleas affirmed.

IssueFree

Whether a specialized board hearing expert testimony is required to reach the same conclusion as the expert witness.

Unlock the full brief

Free accounts read 20 full briefs. No card required.

Start freeLog in

Related cases

Davidson v. Prince813 P.2d 1225 (Utah App. 1991)Jones v. O'Young607 N.E.2d 224 (1992)Fielding v. State842 P.2d 614 (Alaska App. 1992)Melville v. Southward791 P.2d 383 (1990)Menendez v. Superior Court834 P.2d 786 (Cal. 1992)