Lawwly

Chesapeake & Ohio Railway v. Martin

United States Supreme Court

283 U.S. 209 (1931)

Relevant factsFree

Chesapeake & Ohio Railway (defendant) shipped potatoes for Martin (plaintiff) under a bill of lading requiring claims within six months of a reasonable delivery time; the potatoes were misdelivered to the wrong warehouse and spoiled. Martin sued more than six months and twenty days after shipment. At trial, a railway employee testified, unchallenged and uncontradicted, that eight days was a reasonable delivery time — a period the shipment in fact met, since it arrived in Virginia within six days, leaving two more for warehouse delivery. The jury nonetheless found for Martin, the appellate court affirmed, and the railway sought Supreme Court review.

IssueFree

Whether, under Virginia law, the credibility of an interested witness must always be submitted to the jury even where the witness's testimony is reasonable, unchallenged, and unrefuted.

Unlock the full brief

Free accounts read 20 full briefs. No card required.

Related cases