Lawwly

In re Application of Converse

Nebraska Supreme Court

602 N.W.2d 500 (1999)

Relevant factsFree

Law school graduate Paul Converse (plaintiff) engaged in a repeated pattern of confrontational behavior toward law school administrators, faculty, and students over perceived slights and grievances, personally attacking and attempting to intimidate and humiliate his perceived adversaries (at times with sexually inappropriate overtones) and publicizing these disputes to the media, courts, and the bar association; the Nebraska State Bar Commission (defendant), after a hearing uncovering this pattern, denied his application to sit for the bar exam based on deficient moral character, and Converse appealed, arguing the denial improperly penalized First Amendment-protected speech.

IssueFree

Whether a state bar commission may deny an applicant admission to the bar based on inappropriate conduct, even if that conduct might otherwise be protected by the First Amendment.

Unlock the full brief

Free accounts read 20 full briefs. No card required.

Related cases