Harris v. New York
United States Supreme Court
401 U.S. 222 (1971)
Relevant factsFree
Harris (defendant) was arrested for selling drugs to an undercover officer. At trial, he testified in his own defense, and on cross-examination the prosecution used his earlier unwarned statements to challenge his credibility. The statements were never used in the prosecution's case-in-chief, and the jury was told they could only be used to assess Harris's credibility. Harris was convicted, and the New York Court of Appeals affirmed per curiam.
IssueFree
Whether statements made by a suspect who has not received Miranda warnings may be admitted at trial for impeachment purposes.