Gonzales v. Carhart
United States Supreme Court
550 U.S. 124 (2007)
Relevant factsFree
The federal Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act (PBABA) prohibited "intact dilation and evacuation" (Intact D&E), a specific second-trimester abortion method, while leaving standard D&E procedures untouched; Dr. Carhart (plaintiff), who performed Intact D&E, sued Attorney General Gonzales (defendant) to enjoin the law, arguing it was unconstitutionally vague and lacked a maternal-health exception. The district court and court of appeals agreed the PBABA was unconstitutional.
IssueFree
Whether Congress may ban a specific type of partial-birth abortion procedure, provided the restriction is narrow and clearly defined and does not impose an undue burden on a woman's right to an abortion.
Related cases
Philip Morris U.S.A. v. Williams127 S. Ct. 1057 (2007)Hein v. Freedom From Religion Foundation127 S. Ct. 2553 (2007)Massachusetts v. Environmental Protection Agency549 U.S. 497 (2007)Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School Dist. No. 1127 S. Ct. 2738 (2007)Morse v. Frederick551 U.S. 393 (2007)