Lawwly

DiGuiseppe v. Lawler

Texas Supreme Court

269 S.W.3d 588 (2008)

Relevant factsFree

DiGuiseppe (defendant) declined to make his contract's final $400,000 deposit after disputing whether the city had approved rezoning exactly "as applied for," and when Lawler (plaintiff) sued for breach, DiGuiseppe counterclaimed for specific performance; a jury awarded DiGuiseppe both damages and specific performance, but the court of appeals reversed on the ground DiGuiseppe never proved he was actually ready, willing, and able to complete the purchase at the time closing would have occurred.

IssueFree

Whether a buyer is entitled to specific performance if he cannot prove he was ready, willing, and able to complete the purchase at the time the transaction would have closed.

Unlock the full brief

Free accounts read 20 full briefs. No card required.

Related cases