Zuver v. Airtouch Communications Inc.
Washington Supreme Court
103 P.3d 753 (2004)
Relevant factsFree
Zuver (plaintiff) signed a mandatory arbitration agreement as a condition of her employment with Airtouch (defendant); after her termination, she sued for disability discrimination, and Airtouch moved to compel arbitration. Zuver argued the agreement, including its confidentiality and attorneys'-fees provisions, was unconscionable.
IssueFree
Whether an arbitration agreement is unconscionable if it contains overly harsh or one-sided terms.