
Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.
United States Supreme Court
555 U.S. 7 (2008)
Relevant factsFree
The Navy obtained an exemption to use mid-frequency active sonar during training exercises off Southern California, having prepared only an environmental assessment rather than a full environmental impact statement. Environmental groups (plaintiffs) sued, arguing the sonar harmed marine mammals and that a full EIS was required; the district court found merely a 'possibility' of irreparable harm sufficient and granted a preliminary injunction restricting sonar use, which the court of appeals affirmed.
IssueFree
Whether, in awarding injunctive relief, a court must balance the competing claims of injury and consider the effect the requested relief will have on each party.
Related cases
Cavel International, Inc. v. Madigan500 F.3d 551 (7th Cir. 2007)Citigroup Global Markets, Inc. v. VCG Special Opportunities Master Fund Ltd.598 F.3d 30 (2010)Lane v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLCCase No. 3:17-cv-00008 (2017)Gonzales v. O Centro Espirita Beneficente Uniao do Vegetal546 U.S. 418 (2006)Perfect 10, Inc. v. Google, Inc.653 F.3d 976 (2011)