Lawwly

Weaver v. Palmer Bros. Co.

United States Supreme Court

270 U.S. 402 (1926)

Relevant factsFree

Pennsylvania's 1923 act banned using shoddy (reused fabric scraps) in new bedding manufacture, and state official Weaver (defendant) threatened Connecticut bedding manufacturer Palmer Bros. (plaintiff), which used shoddy, with fines or imprisonment for violating the ban. Palmer Bros. sued to enjoin enforcement as violating due process and equal protection; the district court granted the injunction, and Weaver appealed.

IssueFree

Whether a state statute banning the use of shoddy material in bedding manufacture violates the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment.

Unlock the full brief

Free accounts read 20 full briefs. No card required.

Related cases