Ware v. Hylton
United States Supreme Court
3 U.S. (3 Dall.) 199 (1796)
Relevant factsFree
During the Revolutionary War, Virginia allowed its debtor-citizens to discharge debts owed to British creditors by paying the amount into a state loan office instead of directly to the creditor, and a Virginia resident (defendant) used this mechanism to purportedly discharge a debt owed to a British citizen (plaintiff); after the war, the British creditor sued to recover the debt, arguing the Virginia discharge mechanism was invalid.
IssueFree
Whether a government may unilaterally eliminate debts owed by its citizens to those of another nation.