Lawwly

Wallace Real Estate Investment Inc. v. Groves

Supreme Court of Washington

881 P.2d 1010 (1994)

Relevant factsFree

Wallace (plaintiff) had assigned rights to purchase property from Groves (defendant) but sent a letter indicating it would be unable to close the deal by the agreed date. Wallace later sued Groves for breach of contract, and the question was whether Wallace's own communication constituted an anticipatory breach discharging Groves's obligations.

IssueFree

Whether an anticipatory breach is characterized by a promisor's unequivocal statement or action indicating an inability to perform contractual obligations.

Unlock the full brief

Free accounts read 20 full briefs. No card required.

Related cases