Lawwly

United States v. Bonds

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

730 F.3d 890 (2013)

Relevant factsFree

Testifying before a federal grand jury investigating steroid use among professional athletes, Barry Bonds (defendant) was asked whether his trainer Greg Anderson ever gave him a self-injectable substance, and responded with a rambling answer ("Statement C") about being a celebrity child who doesn't get into other people's business, which was factually true about his celebrity lineage but did not answer the question; the grand jury later learned the truth about Anderson's PED distribution from other sources and from Bonds himself. A jury convicted Bonds of obstruction of justice under 18 U.S.C. § 1503 based on Statement C, and he appealed to a Ninth Circuit panel.

IssueFree

Whether a factually true but evasive and non-responsive grand jury answer, which implies ignorance the witness does not actually have, can support an obstruction of justice conviction.

Unlock the full brief

Free accounts read 20 full briefs. No card required.