United States v. Ayala-Pizarro
United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
407 F.3d 25 (1st Cir. 2005)
Relevant factsFree
After arresting Ayala-Pizarro (defendant) outside a known drug house with 153 foil packets of heroin, Officer Mulero testified at trial about how drug points typically operate and that heroin at such locations was commonly packaged in aluminum foil, based on his personal experience with that specific house and with drug points generally; Ayala objected that this was undisclosed expert testimony, but the trial court permitted it as lay testimony, and Ayala was convicted and appealed.
IssueFree
Whether, under Federal Rule of Evidence 701, a witness's opinion qualifies as lay testimony if it is not based on scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge.