
United States—Restrictions on Imports of Tuna
General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade Panel
DS21/R-39S/155 (1991)
Relevant factsFree
U.S. law required domestic tuna boats to reduce incidental dolphin deaths and later extended this requirement to foreign nations as a condition of importing tuna into the United States, resulting in an embargo against Mexican tuna that Mexico challenged as an unlawful quota, while the United States argued the measures were product-based regulations under Article III or, alternatively, fell within the Article XX(b) exception for measures necessary to protect animal life.
IssueFree
Whether, under the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, a nation may implement measures to protect environmental resources outside the nation's jurisdiction.
Related cases
The Shrimp-Turtle CaseWT/DS58/AB/R (1998)United States—Measures Affecting the Cross-Border Supply of Gambling and Betting ServicesWT/DS285/AB/R (2005)Continental Casualty Co. v. Argentine RepublicI.C.S.I.D. Case No. ARB/03/9 (Sept. 5, 2008)Air Transport Association of America v. Secretary of State for Energy and Climate ChangeCase C-366/10 (2011)United States v. Yousef327 F.3d 56 (2d Cir. 2003)