Unified School District No. 446, Independence, Kansas v. Sandoval
Kansas Supreme Court
295 Kan. 278 (2012)
After being told her contract would not be renewed, teacher Sandoval's (defendant) union representative verbally negotiated a settlement with the school board, which Sandoval initially told him to accept, but the board's own policy required written resignation submissions and its meeting minutes never mentioned her resignation; the parties continued exchanging draft settlement emails afterward, and Sandoval eventually changed her mind and sought a due-process hearing instead, leading the board to adopt a non-renewal resolution while reserving rights under the alleged oral agreement, and the district sued for a declaration that a binding oral contract existed, which the trial and appeals courts upheld.
Whether a contract is abandoned if one party acquiesces to acts of another party that are inconsistent with the existence of a contract.