Lawwly

Turner Holdings, Inc. v. Howard Miller Clock Co.

United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan

657 F.Supp. 1370 (1987)

Relevant factsFree

Turner Holdings (THI, plaintiff) contracted to help Howard Miller Clock Company (HMCC, defendant) find acquisition candidates in exchange for a success fee on any acquisition made up to two years after termination, so long as the acquired company was 'under consideration' during the contract's term; THI extensively researched and discussed a specific target, Hekman Furniture, with HMCC during the contract period even though Hekman wasn't for sale at the time, and after the parties mutually terminated the contract, HMCC later purchased Hekman. THI sued for its success fee, and HMCC argued 'under consideration' had a narrower specialized meaning requiring the target actually be for sale during the contract term.

IssueFree

Whether one party's uncommunicated understanding concerning the specialized meaning of a contract term is binding on the other party.

Unlock the full brief

Free accounts read 20 full briefs. No card required.