Lawwly

Thomas v. Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co.

United States Supreme Court

473 U.S. 568 (1985)

Relevant factsFree

FIFRA required companies registering pesticides to submit supporting data to the EPA and provided compensation for the EPA's use of that data, with the compensation amount set by binding arbitration; thirteen large chemical firms (plaintiffs) sued the United States (defendant), arguing the binding-arbitration requirement violated Article III, which vests judicial power in Article III courts. The district court agreed with the chemical firms, and the government appealed.

IssueFree

Whether Congress violates Article III of the Constitution by limiting the judiciary's adjudication of rights created by a regulatory scheme.

Unlock the full brief

Free accounts read 20 full briefs. No card required.