Tahoe National Bank v. Phillips

Supreme Court of California

480 P.2d 320 (1971)

Relevant factsFree

To obtain an urgently needed loan, Phillips (defendant) signed a bank-prepared "Assignment of Rents and Agreement Not to Sell or Encumber Real Property" covering her house rather than an actual mortgage; when the loan defaulted, Tahoe National Bank (plaintiff) sought foreclosure treating the document as an equitable mortgage, and the trial court agreed, but Phillips testified she never believed she was signing anything equivalent to a mortgage and lacked authority to mortgage the property as her deceased husband's trustee.

IssueFree

Whether an agreement not to sell or encumber real property can be construed as an equitable mortgage against the reasonable expectations of the assignor.

Holding & reasoning

The court resolved the question by applying the controlling rule to the facts and explaining precisely why the outcome followed. Its reasoning ties the doctrine to the record so you can reproduce the analysis on an exam.

Procedural history, concurrence & dissent

This section traces the case from the trial court through appeal and lays out how each opinion lands. Separate writings sharpen the majority's limits and flag the arguments most likely to resurface in class.

Unlock the full brief

Free accounts read 20 full briefs. No card required.

Start free Log in