Lawwly

Stradford v. Zurich Insurance Co.

United States District Court for the Southern District of New York

2000 WL 31027517 (S.D.N.Y. 2002)

Relevant factsFree

Stradford (plaintiff), a dentist, had his office insured by Zurich Insurance Co. (defendant). After Stradford briefly lapsed on premiums in 1999 and Zurich cancelled and then reinstated the policy, he submitted a water-damage claim just ten days later for frozen pipes and dental supplies totaling $151,000, and after Zurich paid that claim, he submitted a revised claim for $168,000 in property damage plus $1.2 million in business-interruption costs. When Stradford sued for payment under the policy, Zurich counterclaimed for fraud.

IssueFree

Whether a claim for fraud must state the time, place, and nature of the misrepresentations.

Unlock the full brief

Free accounts read 20 full briefs. No card required.