Lawwly

St. Louis v. Wilkinson Law Offices, P.C.

Maine Supreme Judicial Court

55 A.3d 443 (2012)

Relevant factsFree

The St. Louis borrowers (plaintiffs), with no prior commercial-loan experience, sued their mortgage broker and separately sued a law firm (codefendant) whose attorney, Sarah Wilkinson, served only as closing settlement agent -- not as anyone's lawyer -- and accurately read aloud a summary noting the loan's prepayment clause was common and estimated the penalty at about $13,000. The borrowers actually incurred a prepayment penalty exceeding $100,000 when they paid the loan off early. The trial judge dismissed the negligent-misrepresentation claim against the firm, finding Wilkinson's statements accurate and unconnected to who prepared the underlying (inaccurate) summary; the borrowers appealed.

IssueFree

Whether a party to a real estate transaction may commit the tort of negligent misrepresentation by communicating false information to another party to the transaction.

Unlock the full brief

Free accounts read 20 full briefs. No card required.