Lawwly

Saenz v. Roe

Supreme Court

526 U.S. 489 (1999)

Relevant factsFree

California passed a statute limiting welfare benefits for families who had lived in the state fewer than twelve months to the amount payable in their prior state of residence. Roe (plaintiff), a California resident seeking benefits, brought a class action against Saenz, Director of California's Department of Social Services (defendant), on behalf of first-year residents; the lower courts ruled for Roe, and the Supreme Court granted certiorari.

IssueFree

Whether a state may limit the availability of welfare benefits to families residing in the state for less than twelve months consistent with the Privileges and Immunities Clause.

Unlock the full brief

Free accounts read 20 full briefs. No card required.