Sabel v. Mead Johnson & Co.

Sabel (plaintiff) sued Mead Johnson (defendant), alleging its antidepressant caused a priapism that led to surgery and left him impotent. Three pieces of evidence were disputed: a tape of a meeting between outside doctors and Mead Johnson employees discussing the drug's potential adverse reactions; a letter to the FDA's Director; and notes written by an FDA employee.

Whether the three pieces of evidence are inadmissible hearsay.