Lawwly

Rolex Watch, U.S.A., Inc. v. Michel Co.

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

179 F.3d 704 (1999)

Relevant factsFree

Michel Company (defendant) reconditioned used Rolex (plaintiff) watches using non-Rolex parts, including replacing dials, bracelets, and bezels, then sold the reconditioned watches to jewelers while keeping the Rolex trademark on them. Rolex sued for trademark counterfeiting; the district court ruled for Rolex but only required Michel to add its own mark alongside a written disclosure, without enjoining continued use of the Rolex mark. Rolex appealed the adequacy of that remedy.

IssueFree

Whether retaining a trademark on a product reconditioned with parts not made by the trademark owner may constitute trademark counterfeiting.

Unlock the full brief

Free accounts read 20 full briefs. No card required.