Rodriguez v. McDonnell Douglas Corporation
California Court of Appeal
151 Cal. Rptr. 399 (1978)
Relevant factsFree
Rodriguez (plaintiff), a healthy 22-year-old apprentice sprinkler fitter, became triplegic after a 630-pound pipe fell on him while he worked on a hangar project for McDonnell Douglas (defendant) and other contractors. He required extensive surgeries and around-the-clock care from his wife for basic functions. At trial, an economist testified about his lost future earnings and lifelong care costs, and the jury awarded him over $4 million in general damages. The defendants appealed, arguing the award was so large it must reflect jury passion or prejudice.
IssueFree
Whether an appellate court should make all presumptions in favor of the judgment when reviewing a jury's damages award.