Ratcliffe v. Evans
Court of Appeal
2 Q.B. 524 (1892)
Relevant factsFree
After Ratcliffe's (plaintiff) father died, Evans (defendant) published a newspaper article falsely stating that their family business no longer existed; Ratcliffe sued for injurious falsehood, and the trial court ruled in his favor even though he had presented only evidence of a general loss of business rather than any specific, itemized special damages. Evans appealed on the ground that Ratcliffe's failure to plead special damages was fatal to the claim.
IssueFree
Whether, in a claim for injurious falsehood, the plaintiff must prove special damages.