Lawwly

Ratcliffe v. Evans

Court of Appeal

2 Q.B. 524 (1892)

Relevant factsFree

After Ratcliffe's (plaintiff) father died, Evans (defendant) published a newspaper article falsely stating that their family business no longer existed; Ratcliffe sued for injurious falsehood, and the trial court ruled in his favor even though he had presented only evidence of a general loss of business rather than any specific, itemized special damages. Evans appealed on the ground that Ratcliffe's failure to plead special damages was fatal to the claim.

IssueFree

Whether, in a claim for injurious falsehood, the plaintiff must prove special damages.

Unlock the full brief

Free accounts read 20 full briefs. No card required.