Ramada Development Co. v. Rauch

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

644 F.2d 1097 (5th Cir. 1981)

Relevant factsFree

After Rauch (defendant) refused to pay Ramada (plaintiff) the balance owed for building his motel, citing alleged construction defects, Ramada commissioned the Goldsmith Report specifically to investigate those defects so it could have informed settlement discussions with Rauch; when Ramada sued to recover the balance, Rauch sought to introduce the Goldsmith Report at trial, but the district court excluded it as an inadmissible settlement-related document under FRE 408 and ruled for Ramada.

IssueFree

Whether evidence of statements or conduct intended to be part of compromise or settlement negotiations is admissible.

Holding & reasoning

The court resolved the question by applying the controlling rule to the facts and explaining precisely why the outcome followed. Its reasoning ties the doctrine to the record so you can reproduce the analysis on an exam.

Procedural history, concurrence & dissent

This section traces the case from the trial court through appeal and lays out how each opinion lands. Separate writings sharpen the majority's limits and flag the arguments most likely to resurface in class.

Unlock the full brief

Free accounts read 20 full briefs. No card required.

Start free Log in