Lawwly

Potts v. Coe

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia

145 F.2d 27 (1944)

Relevant factsFree

Potts (plaintiff) sued the Commissioner of Patents (defendant) to obtain a patent for an invention developed by his company; the appellate court dismissed his appeal for failing to meet a heightened burden applicable when a corporation, rather than an individual, is the true inventor, relying on congressional findings that patent law aims to encourage individual innovation and that corporate research suppresses it. Potts challenged the court's use of those legislative findings and moved to vacate the dismissal.

IssueFree

Whether a court can take judicial notice of legislative findings.

Unlock the full brief

Free accounts read 20 full briefs. No card required.