Lawwly

Plumb v. Curtis

Supreme Court of Errors of Connecticut

33 A. 998 (1895)

Relevant factsFree

Hanford Plumb (plaintiff) sued Lewis Curtis (defendant) to recover payment for materials Simeon Plumb allegedly bought on Curtis's behalf as his agent; Curtis admitted past agency purchases but denied this particular one. Plumb testified he would not have extended credit if Simeon were buying for himself, since he knew Simeon had poor credit, and the jury found for Plumb; Curtis appealed, challenging the admissibility of that testimony.

IssueFree

Whether evidence substantiating a party's allegation to any reasonable degree is relevant and admissible.

Unlock the full brief

Free accounts read 20 full briefs. No card required.