Lawwly

People v. Stringham

California Court for Appeal for the First District

206 Cal. App. 3d 184 (1988)

Relevant factsFree

Stringham (defendant) and others beat and abducted Paul Snipes over an alleged theft, and Stringham handed a gun to a friend who killed Snipes; originally charged with capital murder by torture, Stringham was offered a plea to voluntary manslaughter after the prosecutor concluded two key witnesses (including a detective who had a heart attack) would be unavailable. Snipes's family strongly opposed the plea deal, prompting a new judge to take over; at a January 1987 hearing, Snipes's father read a statement condemning the plea bargain and calling Stringham a murderer, after which the case was ultimately tried rather than resolved by plea, and Stringham was convicted of second-degree murder and kidnapping. Stringham appealed, arguing the father's statement was improperly allowed at a hearing that wasn't yet a formal sentencing proceeding and that its content was unconstitutionally inflammatory.

IssueFree

Whether a crime victim's next of kin may be permitted to express their opinion to the court on the appropriateness of a proposed plea bargain.

Unlock the full brief

Free accounts read 20 full briefs. No card required.

Related cases