Lawwly

Olden v. Kentucky

United States Supreme Court

488 U.S. 227 (1988)

Relevant factsFree

Olden (defendant), charged with kidnapping, rape, and forcible sodomy after a sexual encounter he claimed was consensual, sought to cross-examine complainant Matthews about her ongoing relationship with his half-brother Russell, arguing she had a motive to falsely claim assault to protect that relationship; the trial court excluded this evidence, apparently concerned about racial prejudice given Matthews was white and Russell Black. The jury acquitted Olden of kidnapping and rape but convicted him of forcible sodomy, and after the Kentucky Court of Appeals affirmed, Olden sought Supreme Court review.

IssueFree

Whether a criminal defendant charged with sexual assault has a Confrontation Clause right to cross-examine the complainant about a potential motive to lie about the alleged assault.

Unlock the full brief

Free accounts read 20 full briefs. No card required.

Related cases