
People v. Pointer
California Court of Appeals for the First District
151 Cal. App. 3d 1128 (1984)
Relevant factsFree
Ruby Pointer (defendant) forced her children onto a dangerous restrictive diet despite medical warnings, resulting in one child's near-fatal malnutrition and permanent brain damage; she was convicted of child endangerment. As part of a five-year probation sentence, the court barred her from conceiving another child during that period. Pointer appealed, arguing the no-conception condition unconstitutionally infringed her fundamental rights to privacy and procreation.
IssueFree
Whether a condition of probation that restricts a fundamental right is unconstitutional if it is impermissibly overbroad.
Related cases
Rumsfeld v. Forum for Academic & Institutional Rights, Inc.547 U.S. 47 (2006)Christian Legal Society Chapter of the University of California, Hastings College of the Law v. Martinez561 U.S. 661 (2010)Cabell v. Chavez-Salido454 U.S. 432 (1982)Legal Services Corp. v. Velazquez531 U.S. 533 (2001)United States v. Kras409 U.S. 434 (1973)