Patton v. Mid-Continent Systems, Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
841 F.2d 742 (1988)
Relevant factsFree
Franchisees Patton and a co-owner (plaintiffs) held exclusive-territory rights under their franchise agreement with Mid-Continent (defendant), but the company awarded competing franchises within the ambiguously defined territory and failed to remedy the situation despite years of notice; the jury found for the franchisees and awarded both compensatory and punitive damages, and Mid-Continent appealed the punitive award.
IssueFree
Whether a franchisee is entitled to punitive damages against a franchisor who breached their agreement by awarding competing franchises within the franchisee's exclusive territory and failed to remedy the breach despite years of notice.
Related cases
Morris Oil Co. v. Rainbow Oilfield Trucking, Inc.741 P.2d 840 (1987)Hillesland v. Federal Land Bank Association of Grand Forks407 N.W.2d 206 (1987)Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. RJR Nabisco, Inc.716 F.Supp. 1504 (S.D.N.Y. 1989)Mill Street Church of Christ v. Hogan785 S.W.2d 263 (1990)Concord Auto Auction, Inc. v. Rustin627 F. Supp 1526 (1986)