Northern California River Watch v. Wilcox
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
633 F.3d 766 (2011)
Relevant factsFree
An endangered plant, Sebastopol meadowfoam, was found on wetlands the Schellingers sought to develop under a Clean Water Act permit, and state wildlife employees removed it during an investigation; River Watch sued under ESA § 9, arguing the wetlands were "areas of federal jurisdiction" because they fell under CWA jurisdiction, while the government urged Chevron deference to Fish and Wildlife Service guidance defining the term.
IssueFree
Whether a federal court may interpret an undefined statutory term that does not warrant Chevron deference.
Related cases
Greater Yellowstone Coalition v. Servheen665 F.3d 1015 (2011)Enyart v. National Conference of Bar Examiners, Inc.630 F.3d 1153 (2011)Lopez-Birrueta v. Holder633 F.3d 1211 (2011)Northwest Environmental Defense Center v. Brown640 F.3d 1063 (2011)American Civil Liberties Union v. United States Department of Defense628 F.3d 612 (2011)