Lawwly

New York Life Insurance v. Dunleavy

United States Supreme Court

241 U.S. 518 (1916)

Relevant factsFree

Boggs & Buhl obtained a valid personal judgment in Pennsylvania against Effie Gould Dunleavy (plaintiff here), then a Pennsylvania resident. Years later, when the surrender value of her father Joseph Gould's life insurance policy with New York Life Insurance (NYLI) (defendant) became payable, Dunleavy claimed the policy had been assigned to her; Boggs tried to attach that money to its earlier judgment, summoning Gould and NYLI as garnishees, and NYLI paid the disputed funds into court and sought interpleader to resolve the competing claims in one proceeding. By then living in California, Dunleavy ignored notice of the interpleader and instead sued in California to recover the money; the Pennsylvania court ultimately ruled the funds belonged to Gould (finding no valid assignment), while the California courts ruled for Dunleavy. Gould appealed, arguing the Pennsylvania judgment barred Dunleavy's California recovery because Pennsylvania had originally had jurisdiction over her.

IssueFree

Whether a court's personal jurisdiction over a party from an earlier, unrelated lawsuit extends to bind that party in a later interpleader proceeding she could not have anticipated when the original suit began.

Unlock the full brief

Free accounts read 20 full briefs. No card required.

Related cases