In re Peterson
United States Supreme Court
253 U.S. 300 (1920)
Relevant factsFree
The District Court for the Southern District of New York appointed an auditor to hold a preliminary hearing determining amounts due for coal sold and delivered in Peterson's case, expressly stating the auditor would not finally decide any issue in the action. Peterson petitioned for a writ of mandamus, arguing the district court lacked authority to appoint an auditor this way and that doing so violated his Seventh Amendment right to a jury trial.
IssueFree
Whether a district court may appoint an auditor to conduct a preliminary hearing to determine certain amounts due as necessary in the case.
Related cases
Kline v. Burke Construction Company260 U.S. 226 (1922)American Well Works Co. v. Layne & Bowler Co.241 U.S. 257 (1916)New York Life Insurance v. Dunleavy241 U.S. 518 (1916)The Dogger Bank Case (Great Britain v. France)The Hague Court Reports 403 (1916)Moore v. New York Cotton Exchange270 U.S. 593 (1926)