Lawwly

Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite Co.

United States Supreme Court

396 U.S. 375 (1970)

Relevant factsFree

Electric Auto-Lite Company (defendant) merged with Mergenthaler Linotype Company, and Mills and other Electric shareholders (plaintiffs) sued to set aside the merger, arguing the proxy statement violated Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act by telling shareholders Electric's board had approved the merger without disclosing that all of Electric's directors were themselves Mergenthaler nominees under Mergenthaler's control. The district court found the omission material and found sufficient causation between the Section 14(a) violation and the plaintiffs' harm, but the Seventh Circuit, while agreeing the proxy statement was improper, reversed on causation after concluding the merger terms were actually fair; the U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari.

IssueFree

Whether, where an omission in a proxy statement is determined to be material, the shareholder has established sufficient causation between the violation of Section 14(a) and his injury.

Unlock the full brief

Free accounts read 20 full briefs. No card required.

Related cases