Lawwly

Migerobe, Inc. v. Certina USA, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

924 F.2d 1330 (1991)

Relevant factsFree

Migerobe (plaintiff) negotiated with Certina salesman Gerald Murff to buy over 2,000 watches at a special discounted price, an arrangement documented across three separate internal Certina (defendant) records: a signed memo from Certina's vice president authorizing Murff to sell at the special price, a signed memo announcing a promotion code covering the special Migerobe order, and an unsigned order form listing the specific quantities, styles, and prices ordered. When Certina's national accounts manager later refused to ship the watches, Migerobe sued for repudiation, and a jury found for Migerobe and awarded damages; Certina appealed, arguing no single writing satisfied the statute of frauds.

IssueFree

Whether writings may be integrated to meet the requirements of the statute of frauds.

Unlock the full brief

Free accounts read 20 full briefs. No card required.

Related cases