Lawwly

Miami Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. Orange Crush Co.

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

296 F. 693 (1924)

Relevant factsFree

Miami Coca-Cola Bottling Co. (plaintiff) entered a perpetual license agreement with Orange Crush Co. (defendant) to buy concentrate from Orange Crush and use it to manufacture, bottle, and distribute a trademarked drink, with Orange Crush also providing some advertising support. The agreement let Miami Coca-Cola cancel at any time. About a year in, while Miami Coca-Cola was actively purchasing concentrate and manufacturing the drink, Orange Crush gave notice it would no longer honor the contract. Miami Coca-Cola sued for specific performance, and the district court ruled the contract void for lack of mutuality; Miami Coca-Cola appealed.

IssueFree

Whether a contract is unenforceable for lack of mutuality when one party retains the unrestricted power to terminate it at will.

Unlock the full brief

Free accounts read 20 full briefs. No card required.

Related cases