Long Island Care v. Coke
United States Supreme Court
551 U.S. 158 (2007)
Relevant factsFree
Coke (plaintiff), a domestic worker providing companionship services, sued Long Island Care at Home and its owner (defendants) under the Fair Labor Standards Act for unpaid minimum and overtime wages; the FLSA exempted domestic workers providing companionship services, and the Department of Labor's regulations extended that exemption regardless of whether the worker was paid by the family or a third-party employer. The district court found the regulation binding and dismissed the case, but the Second Circuit reversed.
IssueFree
Whether a reasonable regulation that fills a gap left by Congress is entitled to deference.
Related cases
Environmental Defense v. Duke Energy Corp.549 U.S. 561 (2007)Gonzales v. Duenas-Alvarez549 U.S. 183 (2007)Massachusetts v. Environmental Protection Agency549 U.S. 497 (2007)National Association of Home Builders v. Defenders of Wildlife551 U.S. 644 (2007)Financial Planning Association v. Securities and Exchange Commission482 F.3d 481 (2007)