Lawwly

Laumann v. National Hockey League

United States District Court for the Southern District of New York

907 F. Supp. 2d 465 (2012)

Relevant factsFree

NHL and MLB teams (defendants) each held initial telecast rights and licensed most games to regional sports networks (RSNs) (defendants), which sold telecasts to consumers (plaintiffs) through distributors like Comcast and DirecTV (defendants); under this system, a standard package let consumers watch only their local in-market team, with out-of-market games blacked out unless purchased through an all-or-nothing national out-of-market package that still excluded in-market games. Consumers sued alleging these arrangements violated the Sherman Antitrust Act by dividing the national market and eliminating inter-team competition, and the defendants jointly moved to dismiss.

IssueFree

Whether agreements limiting the telecasting of professional sports games are subject to antitrust scrutiny and analyzed under the rule of reason.

Unlock the full brief

Free accounts read 20 full briefs. No card required.

Related cases