Lawwly

Jeub v. B/G Foods, Inc.

United States District Court for the District of Minnesota

2 F.R.D. 238 (Minn. 1942)

Relevant factsFree

Jeub (plaintiff) got food poisoning eating ham at a B/G Foods (defendant) restaurant and sued B/G, which obtained a court order to bring in Swift and Company (Swift), the ham's manufacturer, as a third-party defendant. Swift moved to vacate the impleader order, arguing that Jeub hadn't amended the complaint to name Swift directly, and that B/G couldn't currently bring an independent claim against Swift because B/G hadn't yet suffered any actual loss (since the underlying suit against B/G wasn't resolved).

IssueFree

Whether impleader of a third-party defendant is appropriate even if an independent action for monetary recovery could not currently be brought against that third party by the original defendant.

Unlock the full brief

Free accounts read 20 full briefs. No card required.

Related cases