Lawwly

Jackson v. Leach

Court of Appeals of Maryland

152 A. 813 (1931)

Relevant factsFree

Leach (plaintiff) was driving north and the Jacksons (defendants) were driving west when their cars collided at an intersection. Hall, a pedestrian a half block away, testified the Jacksons were speeding as they entered the intersection, but admitted on cross-examination that a corner blocked his view of the cross street, so he only caught a brief glimpse of their car entering. The jury found for Leach, and the Jacksons appealed, arguing Hall's brief glimpse could not support his testimony as a matter of law.

IssueFree

Whether the sufficiency of a lay witness's basis of knowledge to support his testimony is a question for the jury rather than the judge.

Unlock the full brief

Free accounts read 20 full briefs. No card required.

Related cases