Innovation Ventures, LLC v. N.V.E., Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
694 F.3d 723 (2012)
After winning a trademark suit against a different company (N2G) over its "6 Hour ENERGY" drink and securing a court-ordered recall of that product, Innovation Ventures (plaintiff), maker of "5-hour ENERGY," issued a customer notice titled "RECALL of '6 HOUR' SHOT ORDERED" instructing retailers to return "the '6 Hour' energy shots" without specifically naming which product was actually recalled. Competitor N.V.E. (defendant), maker of the unrelated "6 Hour POWER" drink (never recalled), counterclaimed for false advertising, offering evidence of numerous confused retailer calls asking how to return "6 Hour POWER" products; the district court excluded this evidence as hearsay and granted Innovation summary judgment on the counterclaim.
Whether an advertisement that is literally true but potentially misleading must be shown to have actually deceived consumers to be actionable under the Lanham Act.