Lawwly

Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc.

United States Supreme Court

132 S.Ct. 1289 (2012)

Relevant factsFree

Prometheus Laboratories (plaintiff) patented methods for measuring thiopurine metabolite levels to determine whether a drug dosage for treating conditions like leukemia was too high or too low, and sold diagnostic tests embodying those methods. Mayo Collaborative Services (defendant) initially bought Prometheus's tests but later announced it would sell its own test using a different toxicity threshold, prompting Prometheus to sue for patent infringement. The district court granted Mayo summary judgment, finding the patents claimed unpatentable natural phenomena, but the Federal Circuit reversed and upheld the patents.

IssueFree

Whether a natural law or natural phenomenon must be sufficiently added upon or transformed in order to make an idea, formula, mechanism, or test patentable.

Unlock the full brief

Free accounts read 20 full briefs. No card required.

Related cases