In re Tyson Foods, Inc. (Tyson II)
Court of Chancery of Delaware
2007 WL 2351071
Following Tyson I's denial of dismissal as to seven Compensation Committee directors (defendants) over spring-loaded option grants, the directors supplemented the record showing the shareholder-approved plan actually authorized two option types — incentive options (which could not be priced below market value at grant) and non-qualified options (which could be priced at any level) — and argued the challenged spring-loaded grants were simply non-qualified options within their discretion; but Tyson's SEC filings after the grants never clarified that non-qualified options had been issued, stating only that options were granted at that day's stock price. The directors moved for judgment on the pleadings.
Are directors entitled to business judgment rule protection against a breach of duty claim when facts suggest that the directors have concealed the nature of a stock option after the grant?